I had an echocardiogram that showed pulmonary hypertension. What does it mean?

Dr TDiagnosis, Treatment 1 Comment



I just learned that an echocardiogram from 2.5 years ago indicated “mild pulmonary hypertension.” (sPAP was extimated at 38 mmHg.) The echo was done to try to diagnose sudden attacks of shortness of breath that have become less frequent since then.  (No luck with a diagnosis, by the way.)  My brand new pulmonologist wants to do another echo and a CT angiogram to try diagnosing again.  Should I be concerned that over 2 years passed with no further exploration of such a potentially deadly disease, or are we even now acting in a timely manner?  Are there other tests that make sense as well?

I think it is definitely worthwhile to repeat these tests especially another cardiac ECHO. I assume the CT is of your lung and its circulation.

Before I go further, my first question is about what you were told at the time, and why wasn’t it repeated in 3-6 months? An ECHO is only a snapshot of what is going on at the time and needs to be viewed in context of other clinical information!

Since your shortness of breath has improved, have you noticed any decreased exercise tolerance or swelling in your legs? Most patients with PH initially experience exertional shortness of breath, lethargy, and fatigue, that may progress if the right side of the heart begins to fail.

To reassure you, and before we go further, it is unlikely that your shortness of breath would improve while PH is worsening.

However to help you understand PH better, let me review it here.

Comments 1

  1. Pingback: Obesity and a decreased heart function - Cardiac Health

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *