Progressive Diastolic Dysfunction and Heart Failure is associated with Obesity

Diastolic dysfunction is prevalent in obese people age 45  years and older and worsens with time.

In a recent JAMA article only 25% had a BMI <25% and >75% were treated with cardiovascular medications:

There are several conclusions that can be drawn from this article:

  • This is a study of heart failure as a result of obesity.
  • Is Obesity the new body habitus for Americans age 45 years and older?
  • If so, treatment for obesity has yet to become a standard goal of therapy for what has become a new epidemic.
  • Medications don't protect against progression of cardiac dysfunction in the obese.

Dr T

http://www.cardiachealth.org

(From: Progression of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction and Risk of Heart Failure, Garvan C. Kane, MD, PhD et al. JAMA. 2011;306(8):856-863)

 

Comments

Hi Jane,

Re: diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction in the last 10 years, I am sure you are correct.

The authors of this concluded: "... There was a marked progression of diastolic dysfunction: 23% of participants showed worse diastolic function, 68% were unchanged, and 9% improved. A similar pattern of worsening diastolic function also was observed in a subset of healthy participants. Incident heart failure during 6.3 (SD, 2.3) years of follow-up was associated with age, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and diastolic dysfunction..."

Obesity, though observed, was not remarked upon. I believe there are several reasons for this omission:

  1. Almost every patient was either overweight or obese and this did not change from the first to second observation;
  2. Obesity treatments short of bariatric surgery (or prevention) is not effective, or even considered by either patient or physician.

Many years ago, as one of the start-up participants, I suggested to the statistician involved with the The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group (NNECDSG) that Obesity was a significant independant risk factor for (cardiac) surgery. I was told in no uncertain terms I was wrong; only years later increasing numbers of operated obese patients comfirmed statistically what I had known long before.

While a very useful tool, statistics sometimes cannot observe the obvious!

Dr T

http://www.cardiachealth.org

 

Great point. Interesting! One thing that occurs to me however is that maybe diastolic dysfunction has started to be more frequently diagnosed in the last 10 years, and wondering about the role of this in the huge increase in the diagnosis between 1997 and 2004. Also did the authors talk about the clinical significance of the diastolic dysfunction diagnosis in these patients?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.